Public Watchdog.org

Thank God For Separate Church And State

05.07.08

We here at PublicWatchdog are big fans of those dead white guys known as the Founding Fathers.  And their political genius in providing for the separation of church and state by means of the First Amendment was apparent to anyone who attended Monday night’s “Special PADS Workshop Meeting” at City Hall.

What we saw were our elected officials (with two notable exceptions) uniformly acting like public servants instead of politicians – and the members of the Park Ridge Ministerial Association (“PRMA”) acting like politicians instead of clergy.  The highlights (or lowlights, depending on your point of view) included the following:

* Head homeless huckster Beth Nabors of PADS bragging about not knowing any of her real neighbors but feeling “safe and secure” living next door to the PADS shelter at St. James Church in Arlington Heights because all of her PADS “neighbors” have been pre-screened by PADS. 

* None of the PRMA representatives being willing (or able?) to explain exactly how – as in what criteria were used – St. Mary’s was chosen over all of the other churches.  All they would say is that “for various reasons” no churches other than St. Mary’s volunteered to be a PADS site.

* Fr. Ted Stone of Mary Seat of Wisdom explaining how turning away a homeless person “is like turning away Jesus” – but offering no explanation why MSW wants to send “Jesus” to a PADS shelter instead of inviting Him into the MSW parish house for some rest and a meal. 

* The pastor of 1st United Methodist talking about the inconvenience of having to drive a homeless young man out to a shelter in Mt. Prospect.  Apparently, there were no available couches or food at 1st United, either.

* Rev. Amity Carrubba, the temporary pastor of St. Mary’s Episcopal (who reportedly will be gone from there by the time it welcomes its first PADS “guest”) using “I’m not an attorney” to dodge every question about her belief that St. Mary’s doesn’t have to comply with the City’s zoning code – but finally admitting that she was receiving pro bono legal advice from former City Attorney Paul Keller, a St. Mary’s parishioner.

* None of the PRMA representatives being willing to categorically rule out a lawsuit against the City if it doesn’t approve the St. Mary’s PADS shelter.

* MSW Pastor Fr. Gerald Gunderson assuring the Council that when the PRMA identifies a “need” such as a PADS shelter, “you can bet my parish is going to support it.”  Sounds a lot like that shepherd-and-sheep dynamic we noted in our column of May 5th.

* Both Nabors and Pat Harrington of PADS taking every opportunity to toot their own horns, which was not unexpected from people who make a comfortable living from PADS and could prosper even more as new PADS franchises – operating rent-free from church properties while using the free labor of volunteers – are established.

* The PRMA reps constantly using the term “ministry” when referring to the PADS shelter, almost as a mantra to ward off those evil spirits of zoning ordinances and the St. Mary’s NIMBYs – even though PADS is clearly a secular business instead of a religious activity.

Not to be outdone by the clergy, however, 5th Ward Alderpuppet Robert Ryan put his politician’s stripes on display by stressing that “everybody” wants to help the homeless and warning against “divisiveness” – which is RyanSpeak for disagreement with what he wants.  He once again urged the adoption of a “process” to study alternatives to the St. Mary’s site, even though the PRMA has said repeatedly that it already considered all reasonable alternative sites and St. Mary’s was the only one for them. 

But the most bizarre and offensive behavior of the night belonged to Mayor Howard “Let’s Make A Deal” Frimark.  Before the workshop even began, Frimark became visibly agitated upon discovering that Dan Knight was going to be one of the presenters for the NIMBYs.  After unsuccessfully trying to persuade NIMBY leader Phil Donohue to nix Knight, Frimark threatened to publicly embarrass Knight when the meeting began if Knight persisted in being part of the presentation. 

Fortunately, Knight and his fellow presenters stood their ground; Frimark’s bullying proved to be another of his empty threats; the presentation went as planned; and freedom of speech in Park Ridge survived Howard Frimark – and his best efforts to give the PADS/PRMA contingent the “home field” advantage – for at least another day.  

In Support Of NIMBYs

05.05.08

Tonight (May 5, 2008) at 6:30 p.m. at the Park Ridge City Hall (505 Butler Place), the City Council will hold a “Special PADS Workshop Meeting.” As you can see from the agenda [pdf], the Council is apparently planning to pack 80 minutes of workshop into the allotted hour prior to the Council’s 7:30 meeting, so wear your running shoes if you plan to attend.  And attend you should if you’re concerned with the prospect of transient homeless from other communities being imported into Park Ridge.

In a previous article on the proposed PADS shelter in Park Ridge (“In Praise Of NIMBYs,” April 21), we thanked the St. Mary’s Episcopal neighbors for bringing this PADS business squarely to our attention. Now we take the next step and say that we support them in their battle against a PADS shelter in their neighborhood – or anywhere else in Park Ridge, for that matter. After attending the recent Council and community meetings and analyzing the facts and figures provided on the Journeys from PADS to Hope website, we conclude that the PADS program is, at best, a weak half-measure that appears to be generally ineffective in actually combating homelessness, especially given the amount of money and volunteer resources it consumes – a conclusion amply supported by the following “Results” from that website:

OUR RESULTS During the 2006-2007 season, Journeys from PADS to HOPE served over 670 guests through the HOPE Center (1140 E. Northwest Highway) and the 18 faith-based PADS sites throughout the Northwest Suburbs. The HOPE Center received over 6,193 visits from people requesting services, while the PADS sites provided 12,149 overnight stays and 36,447 meals throughout the season. Through the combined efforts of our volunteers and staff, we were successful in transitioning 39 clients out of homelessness and 309 clients in the past 6 PADS seasons out of an emotionally degrading life and into one of hope and independence, giving clients a much needed sense of belonging.

Taking a page from “The Emperor’s New Clothes” playbook, if the best these PADS and HOPE Center people can produce from “12,149 overnight stays” and “36,447 meals” is getting “39 clients out of homelessness,” then it’s time for them to consider a new line of work – because that’s the kind of insipid performance that gets you fired in the real world.

Given such lackluster results, if anybody was looking to open a homeless shelter solely for documented Park Ridge residents they would be well-advised to steer clear of the PADS model altogether. So why is anybody seriously considering that same PADS model for a facility that looks to attract non-Park Ridge homeless – with whatever drug, alcohol and mental illness problems they might have – to our community?  We could rent a block of rooms at the Comfort Inn on Touhy and put them up there – at less cost and without the demand on volunteer time.

This fiasco also lowers our opinion of the Park Ridge Ministerial Association even further. After concealing their PADS shelter plans from the St. Mary’s neighbors and the rest of the community for the better part of two years before arrogantly foisting it on us as a “done deal,” and then attempting to intimidate and even ridicule anyone who opposes it, the PRMA members have acted more like venal politicians than faith ministers – unless they really view the “shepherd” metaphor literally and consider their congregations as nothing more than sheep to be herded in whatever direction these “shepherds” decide.

And while they can call this PADS shelter their “ministry” all they want, there’s nothing religiously ministerial about it. It’s nothing more than a chain of secular not-for-profit flophouses funded by such non-religious entities as the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), the Illinois Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, and tax dollars from Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Mt. Prospect, Palatine, Schaumburg, and their respective township governments.

In summary, this PADS shelter is not a religious ministry; it will contribute nothing positive to our community; and it will consume resources that could be better used for our own citizens and our existing institutions (like the Center of Concern). It’s a dumb idea whose time should never come.

And those responsible for coming up with it and trying to jam it down our throats should be ashamed of themselves. But for some reason we doubt that these neo-Pharisees and their camp followers will see it that way.

A Survey For All Seasons

05.02.08

Mark Twain is reported to have noted that there are “lies, damn lies, and statistics.”  Last week the City announced the results of its latest collection of statistics: A survey of 566 residents on a variety of topics concerning life in Park Ridge.

Frankly, we have never put much stock in these government-sponsored surveys.  Often the questions are slanted and lend themselves to a particular answer, and their results are only as good as the level of knowledge possessed by the respondents – which is a decidedly mixed bag on even the best of days, and on the bad days is little more than garbage in, garbage out.

So we looked at the results – which are available on the City’s website – with more than a little trepidation but with plenty of humor.  And we were not disappointed.

Some questions (and their answers) were obvious throw-aways – such as the rating of “job opportunities” (33% avg, 31% “poor”) or access to “affordable quality housing” (29% avg., 40% “poor”) for an upper-middle class, racially homogenous bedroom suburb.  D’uh.

Some were obvious feel-goods for the politicians and the bureaucrats – such as the vague/nebulous “I am pleased with the overall direction that the City of Park Ridge is taking.” The results (60% avg., 18% “strongly agree,” 40% “somewhat agree”) can be trumpeted by politicians and bureaucrats as an endorsement of their policies and performance even though there appear to have been no benchmarks – none, zero, zip, nada – for the respondents to gauge their responses and, therefore, for any analysis of the results.  

And how does the response to that feel-good question jibe with the responses to the more direct questions like “I receive good value for the City of Park Ridge taxes I pay” (which only pulled a 55% avg, with 32% disagreeing) , or with 53% of the respondents saying that taxes are a “major problem” in Park Ridge? 

Another seeming disconnect is the fact that four times the number of respondents viewed “population growth” as being “too fast” versus the number who thought it “too slow” (16% v. 4%), which dovetails nicely with the report that six times the number of respondents viewed “retail growth” as being “too slow” versus the number who thought it was “too fast” (47% v. 8%).  In other words: Too much residential, not enough retail.  And that’s even before you consider that more respondents think our “land use, planning and zoning” is fair-to-poor than think it is excellent-to-good (54% to 46%).

How do you think the more-is-more condo developers are going to dance around that one?

We’re sure that these results will provide a wealth of entertainment over the next several months, and we look forward to contributing our share to the festivities.  Meanwhile, we do want to leave you with one very positive result: 84% of the respondents voted in the last election, and a whopping 96% said that they plan to vote in the next one. 

This being a “Park Ridge” survey, we’re hoping they were referring to our local elections.