Public Watchdog.org

The Cart Before The Horse, Or A Big Bucket Of Whitewash?

03.07.08

Now that the details of Park Ridge Chief of Police Jeff Caudill’s “Voluntary Separation Agreement And Release Of All Claims” (“The Fix”) are finally being released by the City, we’re left to scratch our heads and wonder even more about the honesty and the judgment of the folks running City Hall.

As best as we can recall, Caudill received annual raises that exceeded the cost of living ever since his promotion to chief in 2000, which we assume were at least in part a reward for his performance.  Those raises were presumably endorsed by then-Alderman now-Mayor Howard Frimark (since 2003), Ald. Rich DiPietro (since 2000), Ald. Jim Allegretti and Ald. Frank Wsol (since 2005), and former City Mgr. Tim Schuenke (since 2000).

So with all those years of performance-based rewards, why was Caudill suddenly shown the door? 

The most common rumor – and we’re stuck with rumor because nobody in a position to know is talking – is that he wouldn’t kow-tow to the mayor and was put in the ejector seat, ready to be launched the moment his boss and protector, Schuenke, left the building.  A variation on that same theme was that he was being booted to make room for a Frimark crony.  And a third version had him voluntarily departing before the Police Dept. was audited and he was sacked for cause.

If Caudill wasn’t getting the job done, why was he getting rewarded year after year with pay raises that not only put more money in his pocket but also drove up the benefits – and the costs – of his pension?  And whether or not Caudill has been getting the job done, the taxpayers still deserve a thorough explanation of why he got pushed out (and by whom), especially with The Fix that will pay him:

  • A lump sum of $70,259;
  • A salary increase of 4% “in recognition of his performance of Fiscal Year 2007/08;
  • An “additional four percent (4%) in exchange for his voluntary separation prior to the commencement of the next fiscal year”; and
  • Two (2) years of medical coverage for Caudill and his eligible dependents, under the same terms as when he was employed.

More troubling than the money, however, is the timing of The Fix – just as the City is planning to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on an outside “audit” of the Police Department to investigate, among other things, a variety of allegations about mismanagement and the mistreatment of our residents that has resulted in more than one lawsuit against the City.  Putting The Fix in now, prior to the investigation, seems at best like putting the cart before the horse.

But more troubling still is the prospect that The Fix will result in a whitewash – at least as to “public” knowledge of any misconduct or incompetence by Caudill, which could effectively deprive the public of key audit information about the Police Department as a whole, as well as the auditors’ opinions and conclusions related to Caudill and his operation of the Department.  That’s because Paragraph 7 of The Fix provides that “Mr. Caudill and City management officials agree to refrain from making statements to the general public or news media disparaging one another.” [Emphasis added]

While non-disparagement language in such agreements is not unusual, its use in The Fix could be a huge mistake in view of the upcoming audit – something City Attorney Everette “Buzz” Hill already started tap-dancing around with his comments at Monday night’s Council meeting that the release of audit information would need to be “managed” so that the non-disparagement provision is not breached.  As Hill admitted about the wording of The Fix, “it is the release of the information to the public that is governed by that non-disparagement clause.”  

So what the City may have done, via The Fix, is contractually bind itself to a level of secrecy (at least about those parts of the audit related to Caudill being disclosed to the public) that exceeds anything it could enforce under the Illinois Open Meetings Act! 

Not surprisingly, the City’s negotiator of The Fix was now-former City Mgr. Tim Schuenke, which shows how Schuenke was able to dis-serve us one last time even as he was walking out the door.  But we also have to question why City Attorney Hill, who we assume is not so dumb that he didn’t realize the cover-up potential of that language, gave it his stamp of approval.  If he wasn’t asleep at the wheel, whose order was he marching to?  And instead of quietly tap-dancing around this issue Monday night, why wasn’t he loudly blowing the whistle on it?

Since the City obviously dropped the ball on this matter but isn’t legally entitled to a do-over, we are left to call on Chief Caudill to do the right thing and agree to amend The Fix to expressly exempt from the non-disparagement provision any fact-finding, conclusions, opinions and recommendations of the auditors.  The public deserves to know those things, and we think that’s the least Chief Caudill can do for his fellow taxpayers in return for the generous benefits he’s getting because The Fix is in.

10 comments so far

Some of ur rant makes sense, but your call for the chief to ammend the fix is irrational. To an objective mind, the chief did nothing to warrant firing nor does howie have the power to take him down or he wouldve been fired. So howie orchestrated this buyout to “catch more bees with honey”. Why then would the chief cooperate with the people who probably tried to force him out. Now ask yourself what he knows that he can’t give up, against the city, that warranted confidentiallity from both sides rather than the city just smearing him as the scapegoat and sendind him packing. Its almost like this audit was some ploy to create hardship. If the true intent was to discovered and reform problems with prpd why on earth wouldnt the do their best to actually keep the chief there until it was complete?????? It a terrible plan.

At this point in time it appears that nobody outside of Chief Caudill and whoever pushed him out the door know for sure whether he should have been fired for cause or asked to stay as chief – or something in between.

But the “right thing” is usually not the thing that’s easiest or best for the individual – in this case it would be the right thing to do for the community who has employed him for the last 30 years and in which he resides.  If there truly was cause to get rid of him, why did they pay him so well to leave – unless, of course, the shoe is on the other foot and they are paying him hush money so that he won’t tell tales out of school about others?

Now that would explain getting rid of him – and buying his silence – before the audit gets going.

First they hide the process or interviewing and hiring the auditors from us, now they’re going to hide the results and bLAME it on the confidentiality deal they cut with Caudill. Whoever the poster was on this site or Underground who said that our public officials treat us like mushrooms – they keep us in the dark and covered in sh*t – was right on the money.

I am your “mushroom” guy Fred.

And I tell you, there is nothing I enjoy more, and have now been doing so for the better part of the last 6 months or so, than reading PW and PRU to keep informed about the goings on in our community. God knows we can hardly rely on the local press (though I will say it’s gotten a little better in terms of reporting very recently).

I know for a fact, since he told me, that Howard reads these blogs too. I assume most of the Alderpuppets as well. I only hope that they are getting a clue that there are many of us, and it’s not just us PW and PRU posters, that are sick of eating the sh*t they keep trying to feed us.

We’re mad as hell and we’re not gonna take it anymore!!!

Have a nice weekend.

More likely they don’t care and are laughing at all this.

There’s are thousands of people like them in public office who think like them.

Of course you gotta wonder what Howard thinks about the funny pictures of him and the PRU site?

I see you are quoting specific language of this separation agreement…Where can I get or review a copy?

You might try filing a FOIA request with the City of Park Ridge to obtain a copy of the separation agreement in its entirety for your personal review.

Good comparison, Wondering. And your right – I know a lot of people who are fed up with the way Ringmaster Howard and his clown car of aldermen are making an expensive circus of city government just with the sweetheart deals we know of, not counting the stuff we don’t know about (like why we offeredd the owner of 720 Garden a couple hundred Gs more than the city’s appraiser said it was worth?)  The way he’s acting, Frimark gives insurance salesmen a bad name.

Mike Touhy – whether there are millions of “them” in public office doesn’t matter. What matters is how many of them are in public office here in Park Ridge. And right now it looks like there are five too many.

Whatever anonymous.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(optional and not displayed)