Public Watchdog.org

District 64’s “Amway” Strategy

04.02.08

On Monday we told you about tonight’s Park Ridge-Niles Elementary School District 64’s dog-and-pony show (7:00 p.m. at District 64 headquarters, 164 S. Prospect) being put on by special invitation for our community’s “key communicators” – members of last year’s referendum committee, members of the district’s Elementary Learning Foundation (ELF), members of the community finance committee and the presidents of each school’s PTO – so they will help sell the rest of us on the District’s plan to add more than $700,000 a year in new personnel, including more administrators.

If you didn’t qualify for an invitation, D-64 might still let you in if you call and RSVP (847.318.4300).  Of course, if too much uninvited riff-raff shows up, there might not be enough room because the D-64 folks chose to stage this pro-spending pep rally at its headquarters rather than in one of its more spacious school auditoriums – presumably because that makes it easier for the Administration and School Board to control the proceedings and the listeners.

Frankly, we think limiting a presentation such as this to a select audience “by invitation” is an insult to all the rest of us taxpayers who will be paying for the new personnel the District wants to add.  And we also think it’s insulting for the District’s elected School Board members and its salaried administrators to engage in what amounts to Amway-style multi-level marketing of their fiscally irresponsible ways through a select group of unelected, unpaid cheerleaders. 

But even though it promises to be a carefully staged event (there’s going to be a Power Point presentation, after all), we hope somebody asks some of the following questions:

*  Why didn’t the District tell us about the “need” for this additional personnel during last year’s referendum campaign?

*  Why should the average D-64 administrator be paid $2,000 a year more ($67,489) than his/her counterparts in Winnetka D-36 ($65,252), $4,000 more than in Wilmette D-39 ($63,433) and $4,000 more than in Deerfield D-109 ($63,063)?

*  Why should the average D-64 teacher be paid $3,000+ a year more ($62,183) than his/her counterparts in Deerfield D-109 ($58,958), almost $4,000 more than in Winnetka D-36 ($58,706), and $6,000 more than in Wilmette D-39 ($56,020)?

*  Why is it that these schools all appear to regularly out-perform D-64 in student testing?

*  How much of the approximately $12 Million in budget cuts you made over the past few years – while assuring us they were not affecting the quality of education in the district – have been restored since the referendum passed last April?

*  Why did the District keep on raising teacher and administrator compensation while it was regularly appearing on the Illinois State Board of Education’s financial “early warning” and “watch” lists for bad financial management?

*  Why did the District use a sneaky “back door” (non-voting) referendum to issue $5 Million in working cash bonds a few years ago rather than do the honest thing and ask the voters for that money through a conventional voting referendum?

But whether you ask questions or just sit and listen, we suggest you bring your own beverage into the meeting…unless you’ve got a taste for Kool-Aid. 

8 comments so far

PW… great coverage of this unfolding debacle at D64. I am sure the folks at D64 love the PADS news that has so many fired up right now… but only because it might take attention away from their hocus pocus act.

You pose some great questions. One can only hope that some of the board takes them up and if not maybe one of the “key communicators” or uninvited public that manages to squeeze into the meeting.

This is a lot like that “back door” referendum you referred to… but a “back door” tax increase instead. They are jacking up some current spend that they made no disclosure of at the time of the most recent referendum and, surprise, imagine a year or two from now when they come looking for a tax increase to cover the then unforeseen budget deficit.

Is there anybody that can keep these damn politicians and public servants out of our pockets? Can you name a single one in about a hundred mile radius of Park Ridge that’s shown any fiscal responsibility in the last few years. All we hear is more, more, more.

You’re right, a meeting like this is insulting to us taxpayers. Too bad these certain well-meaning citizens get used like tools by the school board and the administration.

Hey, didn’t D-64 restore individual music lessons? Why is a school district using taxpayer money for music lessons – private or group???

Wondering:

To answer your question, WE are the only ones who can keep those “damn politicians and public servants out of our pockets” – by paying attention to what they’re doing; by thinking critically about, and aggressively questioning, everything they tell us; by calling them on their lies and half-truths; by holding them accountable for their public actions not just while they’re in office but also after they’ve left; and by supporting and voting for candidates who possess honesty, integrity and an abiding respect for the taxpayer – and who actually stand for things that they are willing to tell us about and then have the courage to fight for.

OK PW…

I agree, I’m trying and sign me up.

Good question by Wondering and an excellent response by Watchdog. Too many people get so caught up in so many trivial things in their own lives and leave government to others, even others who have no competence to actually solve problems and as a result think that throwing money at them will work.

Yeah, throw money at it…and if you’re D-64 or the Park District, do it while shouting “It’s for the kids!” They can never spend too much on “the kids,” especially if most of it is OPM (other people’s money) instead of their own.

Did anyone who posted above actually attend the meeting last night? Feedback/Comments??

Good question, Anonymous @ 1:15 p.m.

We welcome accounts of last night’s meeting from anyone – whether an invitee or a “crasher” – who attended. All we’ve heard so far is that a majority of the attendees were invitees who brought their own Kool-Aid.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(optional and not displayed)