Public Watchdog.org

Howard The Bully (Updated 1/12/09; 1/14/09)

01.09.09

We have referred to Mayor Howard Frimark as “Howard the Coward” for his (and his alderpuppets’) deathly fear of the advisory referendum which Ald. Dave Schmidt (1st Ward) proposed for the big, new, multi-million dollar cop shop for which Frimark has been secretly scurrying around looking to buy land, while at the same time he and his Air Marshall, Alderpuppet Don Bach, have been asleep at the wheel while O’Hare built a new runway that has planes flying through the middle of our city.

Schmidt couldn’t even get a second on his motion to put the referendum on the ballot by City Council resolution, so a group of Park Ridge citizens led by Joe Egan began a petition drive to put the issue on the April ballot anyway.  And from what we hear, they had collected well over 1,000 signatures toward the 2,300-plus that they need.

But because the deadline for filing those petitions is rapidly approaching, Mr. Egan and his merry band of petitioners made arrangements to collect signatures at Oberweis this past weekend.  To describe what happened next, however, we originally relied on two e-mails that Mr. Egan circulated Friday afternoon (which, by the way, we received from several different reliable sources other than Mr. Egan), but which we removed at Mr. Egan’s subsequent request. 

We encourage you to contact Mr. Egan directly ([email protected]) if you have any questions that haven’t been fully answered by the account of the incident published today in the on-line Herald-Advocate (“Swoboda investigates charges that officers blocked petition signing,” January 12) – which reports how the cop shop referendum petition drive scheduled for Oberweis Dairy last Friday and Saturday was cancelled in response to complaints to Oberweis corporate headquarters by Mayor Howard “We don’t need no stinking referendum” Frimark.

And if Frimark’s brazen and ham-fisted interference with a lawful citizen initiative isn’t despicable enough, the H-A also reports that some of Park Ridge’s “finest” also may have shown up in uniform at Oberweis to let the local store manager know that hosting a cop shop petition drive wasn’t the smartest idea. That’s the conduct that acting Police Chief Tom Swoboda is investigating.

In a universe of unlimited possibilities, we’re sure that some mathematician could provide calculations showing how there must be at least one plausible explanation that passes the smirk test for how (1) Oberweis corporate could give Mr. Egan permission to collect referendum signatures (2) under some kind of mistaken belief that Egan and friends were city workers taking a “straw poll” on building a new cop shop, (3) which mistaken belief came to Frimark as if in a dream (4) just in time for him to call Oberweis corporate and (5) convince said dairyfolk, based merely on his complaints, that (6) it had landed in a political briar patch (7) also just in time for Oberweis to withdraw its permission (8) before Egan et al. could collect any valuable petition signatures, (9) either before or after uniformed Park Ridge police officers paid a visit to the local Oberweis manager and (10) suggested that referendum petitions and ice cream don’t mix.

There could be a perfectly innocent explanation for all that. Yeah. Sure. Of course.

The H-A reports that Frimark did not return its phone calls on Monday.  Given Frimark’s penchant for publicity, his not returning press inquiries should have the H-A’s Jennifer Johnson either phoning Lutheran General to see if the mayor has been admitted, or dialing up his estimable political operative Linda Ski to see if Frimark has memorized his talking points yet.

None of this, however, changes our opinion that the current mayor is a coward for trying to prevent the voters of Park Ridge from showing their support or opposition for the proposed new cop shop at the polls on April 7.  Or our opinion that mayoral powers can turn even a coward like Howard into a bully.

Update 1/14/09
Today’s Park Ridge Journal reports (“Bullying Charges Fly,” January 14) that in Mayor Frimark explained his call(s) to Oberweis Dairy owner Jim Oberweis as having been motivated by concerns about the effect of referendum petition gathering on the dairy’s business: “I was shocked that businesses would become politically active, possibly hurting their business.”

So if we are to believe Frimark [Insert your own comment here], we wonder if the folks over at Morningfields [pdf] understood the risk they were taking by hosting Frimark’s own campaign kick-off party back in December? 

One further bit of inanity reported in the Journal article relates to a Library staff member forcing a referendum petition circulator off Library property last Sunday.  When questioned as to the authority of Library staff to take such action, City Attorney Everette “Buzz” Hill admitted that there was no such restriction in the City Code, but that there was an “internal” Library policy prohibiting any “solicitation” within 50 feet of the Library entrance, a policy he defended by asserting that “[t]he library grounds are not what are known as a traditional public forum,” permitting Library Staff to regulate the time, place and manner of the exercise of free speech on those grounds.

What this sounds like to us is a twisted version of a scene from the movie “Animal House,” with Librarian Janet Van De Carr (in the Dean Wormer role) putting the Deltas (the referendum petition circulators) on “double secret probation” (the internal Library no-solicitation policy).  So to take this absurdity to its “logical” conclusion, maybe the petition circulators should turn out en masse at tomorrow night’s Library Board meeting, have petition drive leader Joe Egan upbraid Board President Shlomo Crandus (as Greg Marmalard), Van De Carr/”Wormer,” and the rest of the Board for their First Amendment-mocking “internal” rule, and then have Egan (in his best Eric “Otter” Stratton manner) assure them that “we’re not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America” – while his fellow petition circulators hum “The Star Spangled Banner.”

Meanwhile, we invite Buzz Hill to explain the legal authority for his opinion that the 50 feet surrounding a public library entrance cannot be considered “a traditional public forum” for our citizens’ exercise of their First Amendment rights.

18 comments so far

Blessed excrement! ::eyes pop out of head:: A coward AND a bully, for sure.

open up a spot for him in the Illinois politicians’ wing of the prison!

My God… can the man be a bigger boob?!? (That was a rhetorical question… of course he can!)

Whatever happens to Joe Egan and his gang of petition passes the Mayor has shown his true colors as a bully and a coward. The sort of behavior he is exhibiting somewhat mirrors the erratic behavior of our current Govorner, and didn’t one of his former top aides just say the Govorner should have his head examined?

April can’t come soon enough.

Who to believe…Egan…or Frimark?

That’s the easiest decision I had to make today.

Frimark’s an embarrassment to insurance salesmen.

“the political nature of the petition”???

uh…are there any other kind of petitions?

Here is what I find striking. If you are going to do something like this, wouldn’t you have someone else do it??

One of the first rules in cooked Illinois politics is insulate yourself. Did he not think this would get out and what the public reaction would be????

All I can say is what a DOPE!!!!

Anon4:22,

He is a DOPE, but not as dopey as you might think. Howard Frimark makes phone calls and loves to meet for coffee. He enjoys the bluster of being the big man in charge. He is smart enough never to put any of his threats or lies in writing.

The way Howard Frimark conducts business is to make all manner of intimidating statements up close and in personal ways that can become little more than he-said/he-said public discussions, and to those whom threats have been made there is no paper trail to prove that Howard Frimark is again telling a lie.

alpha female – no, there is no paper trail, but there certainly could be taped recordings of these conversations! oh, Pat Fitzgerald, please save us!

Anyone know why Mr. Egan asked to have to E-mail removed from this site?

A8:33,

Yes, of course we know why Mr. Egan asked to have the text of his email correspondence removed from our site.

Mr. Egan is a non-confrontational man who is afraid Howard Frimark will take some drastic action against him. The fact that any such action would be unfounded or ill-founded does not matter to Howard Frimark.

Maybe he will refuse to plow the street that Mr. Egan lives on. Whoooops, too late!!!

Does anyone know how the number of signatures to get a referendum on the ballot is determined? PWD mentioned that over “2.300-plus” are currently needed for the right to vote on the PD building, yet only “1,100 signatures” were needed for the aldermen cutback referendum, according to the Russ Steward blog: http://www.russstewart.com/2-28-07.htm

It is my understanding the law changed effective January 1. Bad luck for the citizens. They are well past the number they needed under the old law.

Does anyone have any idea how close/far they are to/from the required number of signatures? What is the deadline for turning them in?

The petition drive is getting close, but not yet there. If you haven’t signed, the petitions are still available at New Prospects. Maybe buy a designer blouse and accessories while you’re there. The owner of NP refused to be intimidated by a mystery caller.

If there is no police station referendum on the April 7th ballot, then I, who voted for Frimark last time, will switch sides to vote for Dave Schmidt as my “no” vote for a $16.5 million police station.

PNG,

I can think of more reasons for you to switch your vote than just one issue, but maybe you agree with Howard Frimark on all the issues with which I disagree with Howard Frimark.

Then there are the other issues of Howard Frimark’s lack of ethics and honest conduct.

I just talked to the library business office and was told that tomorrow night’s meeting is a committee meeting and that the board meeting is next Tuesday, January 20th.



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(optional and not displayed)